This past class we white boarded yet another lab, the tile
lab, from our “laborama” (see first post). In this lab we had to compare the
area and the mass of VERY odd, annoying, and
random cut pieces of carpet.
1)
Question
·
What is the relationship between area and mass?
2)
Prediction
·
Our group predicted a direct, linear graph with
a small gradient. Also, area would be the independent variable(x) and mass
would be the dependent variable(y).
3)
Set-Up
·
The set-up of this lab was pretty simple. Since
we’re not allowed to “calculate” measurements (meaning we can’t use math to
find our measurements), we had to trace the tiles on a piece of graph paper and
count the number of squares to find the mass. Then to find mass, we used the
triple beam balance.
4)
Data
·
Ok. So obviously if you looked at my group’s
data table, you can see that a few of the measurements are really weird and
completely off. I feel that some of the problems were due to the fact that we
had multiple people trying to count the squares each using a different method.
5)
Graph (& Formula)
·
Our graph is probably really confusing because
there are two formulas and one of them is quadratic even though the line is
evidently linear. So our group was split between linear and quadratic. The half
that thought it was quadratic only picked so because the points lined up well
with that equation; while, my half went with linear because we knew that linear
was the obvious chose and the linear equation lined up very well without the
outliers.
6)
Conclusion
·
On the picture, the conclusion says, “For every
cm² that area increases, mass increases by .006 grams”. That conclusion
statement was for the other half of the group’s equation. So for our conclusion
we got – For every cm² that area increases, mass increases by about 1.8 grams.
No comments:
Post a Comment